Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 28;5(9):e13044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013044

Table 3. Sensitivity analysis of number of meningitis cases, deaths and sequelae averted correlated with introduction of IDSR: Paired-comparison of outbreaks before (1996–2002) and after (2003–2007) IDSR implementation:

Outcomes measures# Including 1996 data Excluding 1996 data
Median Average * Median Average *
(25th percentile 75th percentile) (minimum maximum) (25th percentile 75th percentile) (minimum maximum)
Total cumulative cases averted (per 100,000) −48(58 −201) −134(666 −4,769) −27(80 −115) −17(666 −877)
Total cumulative deaths averted (per 100,000) −10(−1 −25) −19(61 −250) −8(1 −17) −10(61 −102)
Total cumulative sequelae averted (per 100,000) −15(18 −65) −44(267 −2,092) −8(25 −38) −6(267 −375)

We compared health outcomes for each of the 105 outbreaks before IDSR with each of the 86 outbreaks after IDSR implementation. We then re-ran these paired comparisons excluding the 1996, before IDSR data.

#

Number of health outcomes averted was calculated using the following equation: Outcome outbreak X after IDSR – Outcome outbreak Y before IDSR, where X for outbreak after IDSR and Y for outbreak before IDSR.

We calculated the number of sequelae by assuming 20% of all meningitis illness-related survivors have neurological defects (see main text).

Negative figure indicates reduction in cases, deaths, and sequelae per outbreak after IDSR implementation.

*These columns present the simple average, minimum and maximum of the differences in health outcomes between paired outbreaks.

Data Source: WHO Multi-Diseases Surveillance Center, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.