Table 3. Sensitivity analysis of number of meningitis cases, deaths and sequelae averted correlated with introduction of IDSR: Paired-comparison of outbreaks before (1996–2002) and after (2003–2007) IDSR implementation:
Outcomes measures# | Including 1996 data† | Excluding 1996 data† | ||
Median¶ | Average¶ * | Median¶ | Average¶ * | |
(25th percentile 75th percentile) | (minimum maximum) | (25th percentile 75th percentile) | (minimum maximum) | |
Total cumulative cases averted (per 100,000) | −48(58 −201) | −134(666 −4,769) | −27(80 −115) | −17(666 −877) |
Total cumulative deaths averted (per 100,000) | −10(−1 −25) | −19(61 −250) | −8(1 −17) | −10(61 −102) |
Total cumulative sequelae averted (per 100,000) | −15(18 −65) | −44(267 −2,092) | −8(25 −38) | −6(267 −375) |
We compared health outcomes for each of the 105 outbreaks before IDSR with each of the 86 outbreaks after IDSR implementation. We then re-ran these paired comparisons excluding the 1996, before IDSR data.
Number of health outcomes averted was calculated using the following equation: Outcome outbreak X after IDSR – Outcome outbreak Y before IDSR, where X for outbreak after IDSR and Y for outbreak before IDSR.
We calculated the number of sequelae by assuming 20% of all meningitis illness-related survivors have neurological defects (see main text).
Negative figure indicates reduction in cases, deaths, and sequelae per outbreak after IDSR implementation.
*These columns present the simple average, minimum and maximum of the differences in health outcomes between paired outbreaks.
Data Source: WHO Multi-Diseases Surveillance Center, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.