Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 17;17(6):766–773. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.243

Table 2A. Genotype frequencies comparison between ET patients and controls according to the country and to family history.

Patients Genotype frequencies Statistical comparisona P-value (χ2) P-value correctedb
  AA (Ser9Ser) (%) AG (Ser9Gly) (%) GG (Gly9Gly) (%)      
Controls (German/Danish/French) (1) 248 (47) 226 (43) 54 (10)  
All ET (German/Danish/French) (2) 131 (44) 136 (45) 32 (11) (1)–(2) 0.68  
German/Danish/French ET without family history (3) 50 (52) 37 (38) 10 (10) (1)–(3) 0.68  
German/Danish/French ET with family history (4) 81 (40) 99 (49) 22 (11) (1)–(4) 0.24  
        (3)–(4) 0.16  
German ET with family history (5) 62 (46) 59 (44) 14 (10)  
German controls (6) 145 (47) 131 (42) 35 (11) (5)–(6) 0.94  
French ET with family history (7) 12 (25) 32 (65) 5 (10)  
French controls (8) 75 (45) 74 (45) 16 (10) (7)–(8) 0.0262 0.16b

Genotypes in both patients and controls were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.

a

Statistical comparison of the different numbered case/control groups.

b

Correction for multiple testing (six tests)

Bold values represents P-value <0.05