Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 20;92(14):2387–2401. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01270

TABLE I.

Quantitative Analysis of Cells at the Tendon-Bone Interface of the Tibial Tunnel After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Cells per High-Power Field*
Group Immobilization Immediate Loading Early Delayed Loading (Postop. Day 4) Late Delayed Loading (Postop. Day 10)
ED1+ macrophages
2 weeks 2.42 ± 0.12a 2.96 ± 0.05b 1.49 ± 0.17a,b 0.63 ± 0.2a,b
4 weeks 2.53 ± 0.82c 2.02 ± 0.91d 0.97 ± 0.21c,d 0.54 ± 0.13c,d
ED2+ macrophages
2 weeks 1.71 ± 1.5e 1.14 ± 0.47f 2.62 ± 0.54e,f 2.97 ± 0.7e,f
4 weeks 0.83 ± 0.6g 1.36 ± 0.16h 3.37 ± 0.29g,h 3.35 ± 0.51g,h
Osteoclasts (tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining)
2 weeks 1.44 ± 0.2i 1.02 ± 0.08j 0.58 ± 0.37i,j 0.35 ± 0.15i,j
4 weeks 0.69 ± 0.08k 1.22 ± 0.17l 0.29 ± 0.14k,l 0.33 ± 0.15k,l
Neovascularity (smooth-muscle-actin staining)
2 weeks 0.78 ± 0.39m 1.54 ± 0.22n 0.3 ± 0.17m,n 0.27 ± 0.15m,n
4 weeks 1.03 ± 0.62o 0.83 ± 0.46p 0.31 ± 0.16o,p 0.22 ± 0.1o,p
*

Data are reported as the mean and standard deviation. Values that share a letter were significantly different from one another, with a, b, c, d, i, j, k, and l indicating p < 0.01; e, f, g, and h indicating p < 0.02; and m, n, o, and p indicating p < 0.003.