Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 1;21(19):3317–3329. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-03-0245

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Role of PAK4 in MCF-7 cell adhesion on VN. (A) Left, cell attachment of MCF-7 cells stably expressing Flag-PAK4 or Flag-BAP at different coating concentrations of VN was determined. Graph shows means of optical density ± 95% confidence intervals; n = 3 from one representative experiment. Right, the protein levels of endogenous PAK4 and stably expressed Flag-PAK4-WT or Flag-BAP (as a control) in MCF-7 cells were detected by IB using anti-PAK4 pAb (top panel), anti-Flag (M2) mAb (middle panel) with anti-actin mAb as loading control (bottom panel). (B) Left, cell attachment of MCF-7 cells transiently expressing PAK4-siRNA or control siRNA at different coating concentrations of VN was determined. Graph shows means of optical density ± 95% confidence intervals; n = 3 from one experiment. Right, PAK4 siRNA-mediated knockdown was determined by IB using tubulin as loading control. (C) Cell attachment was determined of MCF-7 stably expressing control shRNA and stable PAK4 shRNA expressing MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with EGFP (as a control) or EGFP-PAK4-AC285, 288GA (RNAi-resistant PAK4) at different coating concentrations of VN. Graph shows means of number of cells per field ± 95% confidence intervals; n = 3 from one experiment. (D) PAK4 shRNA-mediated knockdown and expression levels of EGFP and EGFP-PAK4 for cells used in C were determined by IB using actin as loading control. All experiments in Figure 2 were repeated at least three times with similar results. p values are indicated for statistically discernable differences compared with control (A and B) or to PAK4-shRNA cells (C) according to unpaired two-tailed t test (*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure