Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Mutat. 2010 Oct;31(10):1142–1154. doi: 10.1002/humu.21328

Table 1.

Inclusion criteria for patient groups

Column A All required Column B Minimum of one required Column C Confirming features1
OFD-overlap Polydactyly Oral frenulae
Oral hamartoma
Clef lip/palate
Cerebellar vermis hypoplasia
Tibial hypoplasia
PHS Mesoaxial polydactyly
Hypothalamic hamartoma
GCPS Preaxial polydactyly Syndactyly
Macrocephaly
Hypertelorism
Postaxial polydactyly
Sub-PHS Mesoaxial polydactyly
Hypothalamic hamartoma
Oligodactyly
OR
Postaxial polydactyly plus one feature from column C
Bifid epiglottis
Imperforate anus
Small nails
Hypopituitarism
Growth hormone deficiency
Genital hypoplasia
Sub-GCPS Preaxial polydactyly
Broad thumbs or great toes
Syndactyly
Macrocephaly
Hypertelorism
OR
Postaxial polydactyly plus one feature from column C
Hypoplasia of the corpus callosum
1

Confirming features were used to place individuals with into sub-PHS or sub-GCPS groups when their only feature from column B was postaxial polydactyly.

Probands were evaluated sequentially for inclusion in the OFD-overlap group, then the PHS or GCPS groups and lastly the sub-PHS or sub-GCPS groups. Probands were placed into the first group where they fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Individuals who fulfilled the criteria for both sub-PHS and sub-GCPS were placed based upon the number of features they demonstrated for each group.