Skip to main content
. 2010 May 22;468(11):3028–3034. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1392-7

Table 6.

Previous studies describing patients with UE compared with those with PE

Author Numbers OS/DSS MFS LRFS Variables significant different between two groups
PE UE PE UE PE UE PE UE
Chui et al. [3] 19 60 74%* 98%* 57%* (event-free) 98%* (event-free) NA NA Site, size
Potter et al. [12] 139 64 60% 74% NA NA 90%* 64%* Size, depth, microscopic margins, flap or FSG coverage, chemotherapy, followup periods
Temple et al. [15] 17 18 NA NA NA NA NA NA Delay in receiving treatment, free flaps, perioperative complications
Lewis et al. [8] 685 407 70%* 88%* 63%* 83%* NA NA Size, depth microscopic margins
Thacker et al. [16] 23 29 80% 73% NA NA 91% 79% Free flap, radiotherapy
Arai et al. [current study] 128 63 86% 96% 71% 86% 85% 92% Size, depth, flap or FSG coverage, chemotherapy, intraoperative blood loss

* Significant difference between cohorts; OS = 5-year overall survival; DSS = 5-year disease-specific survival; MFS = 5-year metastasis-free survival; LRFS = 5-year local recurrence-free survival; PE = planned excision; UE = unplanned excision; NA = not available, no accurate data described in the articles; FSG = free skin graft.