Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 14;107(39):17035–17040. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006225107

Table 2.

Best spatial regression models of host variables predicting Epifagus virginiana genetic distances

Model (EV ∼) Intercept Coefficient Z-value ρ AIC ΔAIC wAIC
F.gen 0.03307 −0.00301 0.214 0.960 −5347.7 12.7 0.00
F0.5 0.04669 −0.00109 0.000 0.945 −5360.4 0.0 0.59
F.age 0.03417 0.00061 0.002 0.949 −5355.9 4.5 0.06
F.avgP 0.03670 −0.00103 0.034 0.957 −5350.6 9.8 0.00
F.varP 0.03123 −0.00005 0.389 0.961 −5346.9 13.5 0.00
F.avgP + 0.04195 −0.00116 0.020 0.943 −5359.3 1.1 0.35
F.age 0.00065 0.001

Fagus grandifolia and E. virginiana variables are shown in Fig. 2. Coefficients and their corresponding Z-values refer to host data layer coefficients, whereas ρ is the spatial lag coefficient. All values of ρ were significant (P < 0.01). AIC, ΔAIC, and weighted (w)AIC values are reported following Wagenmakers and Farell (25). The best model is in boldface type.