Table 2.
Model (EV ∼) | Intercept | Coefficient | Z-value | ρ | AIC | ΔAIC | wAIC |
F.gen | 0.03307 | −0.00301 | 0.214 | 0.960 | −5347.7 | 12.7 | 0.00 |
F0.5 | 0.04669 | −0.00109 | 0.000 | 0.945 | −5360.4 | 0.0 | 0.59 |
F.age | 0.03417 | 0.00061 | 0.002 | 0.949 | −5355.9 | 4.5 | 0.06 |
F.avgP | 0.03670 | −0.00103 | 0.034 | 0.957 | −5350.6 | 9.8 | 0.00 |
F.varP | 0.03123 | −0.00005 | 0.389 | 0.961 | −5346.9 | 13.5 | 0.00 |
F.avgP + | 0.04195 | −0.00116 | 0.020 | 0.943 | −5359.3 | 1.1 | 0.35 |
F.age | 0.00065 | 0.001 |
Fagus grandifolia and E. virginiana variables are shown in Fig. 2. Coefficients and their corresponding Z-values refer to host data layer coefficients, whereas ρ is the spatial lag coefficient. All values of ρ were significant (P < 0.01). AIC, ΔAIC, and weighted (w)AIC values are reported following Wagenmakers and Farell (25). The best model is in boldface type.