Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct;12(Suppl 1):S4–S11. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq050

Table 5.

Predictors of quit maintenance

Core predictor variable Other variables included at each step
Demographic set Plus other motivation to quit variables Plus motivation-related set Plus dependence set
Want to quit
Waves 3–4 0.89 (0.78–0.99) 0.95 (0.83–1.09) 0.96 (0.82–1.13) 1.00 (0.85–1.17)
Waves 4–5 0.81 (0.72–0.91) 0.83 (0.71–0.96) 0.90 (0.75–1.08) 0.90 (0.75–1.08)
Waves 5–6 0.77 (0.68–0.87) 0.86 (0.74–0.99) 0.95 (0.80–1.14) 0.96 (0.80–1.15)
Freq of butting out
Waves 3–4 0.91 (0.83–0.99) 0.94 (0.85–1.03) 0.93 (0.84–1.02) 0.90 (0.81–1.00)
Waves 4–5 0.88 (0.80–0.97) 0.90 (0.82–1.00) 0.90 (0.81–1.01) 0.89 (0.80–0.99)
Waves 5–6 0.83 (0.74–0.92) 0.87 (0.78–0.97) 0.89 (0.79–0.99) 0.85 (0.76–0.96)
Financial cost
Waves 3–4 0.81 (0.72–0.91) 0.83 (0.73–0.94) 0.84 (0.74–0.96) 0.89 (0.78–1.01)
Waves 4–5 0.82 (0.72–0.93) 0.85 (0.74–0.98) 0.87 (0.75–0.99) 0.91 (0.79–1.05)
Waves 5–6 0.89 (0.78–1.02) 1.01 (0.88–1.17) 1.04 (0.90–1.20) 1.12 (0.96–1.30)
Health concern
Waves 3–4 0.87 (0.77–0.99) 1.04 (0.86–1.25) 1.04 (0.86–1.26) 1.04 (0.86–1.26)
Waves 4–5 0.89 (0.77–1.03) 1.17 (0.95–1.44) 1.22 (0.99–1.51) 1.20 (0.97–1.49)
Waves 5–6 0.72 (0.62–0.83) 0.82 (0.66–1.00) 0.86 (0.70–1.07) 0.85 (0.68–1.05)
Health outcome expectancy
Waves 3–4 0.92 (0.83–1.01) 0.98 (0.87–1.10) 0.97 (0.86–1.09) 0.99 (0.88–1.12)
Waves 4–5 0.95 (0.85–1.05) 1.06 (0.93–1.21) 1.05 (0.92–1.20) 1.08 (0.94–1.23)
Waves 5–6 0.88 (0.79–0.97) 1.00 (0.88–1.14) 0.99 (0.87–1.12) 0.99 (0.86–1.13)
Lifestyle outcome expectancy
Waves 3–4 NA NA NA NA
Waves 4–5 0.89 (0.79–0.99) 0.93 (0.82–1.06) 0.92 (0.81–1.05) 0.92 (0.81–1.05)
Waves 5–6 0.90 (0.80–0.99) 1.00 (0.88–1.14) 1.02 (0.89–1.16) 1.06 (0.92–1.22)
Overall attitude to smoking
Waves 3–4 0.95 (0.84–1.06) 1.00 (0.88–1.14) 1.00 (0.88–1.14) 1.01 (0.88–1.16)
Waves 4–5 0.90 (0.79–1.02) 0.94 (0.82–1.08) 0.93 (0.80–1.07) 0.95 (0.82–1.10)
Waves 5–6 0.91 (0.81–1.04) 1.04 (0.90–1.19) 1.02 (0.89–1.18) 1.02 (0.88–1.18)

Notes. NA = not applicable.

Figures are odds ratios, and 95% CIs are in parentheses. Bold text indicates statistically significant at p < .05. Step 1 involves seven separate analyses for each wave, while Steps 2–4 are single analyses per wave. Waves 3–4 (n = 1,994 valid + 127 missing), Waves 4–5 (n = 1,662 valid + 103 missing), and Waves 5–6 (n = 1638 valid + 141 missing).