Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet. 2010 Apr 14;375(9724):1437–1446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60172-9

Table 4. Imaging results and circulating tumour cell numbers.

Total No Prior Chemotherapy Prior Chemotherapy
Soft tissue 59 25 34
 Partial response 13 (22%) 9 (36%) 4 (12%)
 Stable disease 29 (49%) 11 (44%) 18 (53%)
Bone scan (week 12) 109 41 68
 Stable disease 61 (56%) 26 (63%) 35 (51%)
FDG PET (week 12)a 22 11 11
 >25% decline from baseline 10 (45%) 6 (55%) 4 (45%)
 <25% decline 12 (55%0 7 (64%) 5 (45%)

Circulating tumour cell numberb 128 60 68
<5 at baseline 77 44 33
 < 5 on treatment 70 (91%) 40 (91%) 30 (91%)
 ≥ 5 on treatment 7 (9%) 4 (9%) 3 (9%)
≥ 5 at baseline 51 16 35
 < 5 on treatment 25 (49%) 12 (75%) 13 (37%)
 ≥ 5 on treatment 26 (51%) 4 (25%) 22 (63%)
a

All 22 patients had at least one FDG-avid lesion that could be used as an index lesion, and the breakdown in terms of patients was 5 index lesions: 16; 4 index lesions: 3; 2 index lesions: 1; 1 index lesion: 1. The range of SUVmax average varied from 2.72 to 16.6 in the 22 patients, and the median SUVmax average was 5.025.

b

<5 CTCs per 7.5 ml is considered favourable; ≥5 is considered unfavourable.