Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Mar;108(4):779–789. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1290-4

Table 2.

Calculated heat balance variables in each critical environment

Mnet (W/m2)
R + C (W/m2)
S (W/m2)
Esk (W/m2)
Ereq (W/m2)
w (%)
Lean Obese Lean Obese Lean Obese Lean Obese Lean Obese Lean Obese
34°C 192 ± 3 161 ± 4* −29 ± 2 −23 ± 2 12 ± 2 10 ± 1 173 ± 11 124 ± 14* 152 ± 5 128 ± 5* 1.54 ± 0.09 1.12 ± 0.05*
36°C 189 ± 10 168 ± 3* −5 ± 3 −2 ± 3 14 ± 2 9 ± 1 188 ± 14 137 ± 20* 170 ± 9 156 ± 4* 1.34 ± 0.07 1.12 ± 0.07*
38°C 195 ± 8 163 ± 4* 16 ± 2 20 ± 2 14 ± 1 16 ± 3 224 ± 10 177 ± 20* 196 ± 7 167 ± 5* 1.33 ± 0.07 1.03 ± 0.06*
42°C 209 ± 4 165 ± 4* 60 ± 3 56 ± 3 23 ± 2 15 ± 2 241 ± 32 179 ± 15* 246 ± 3 205 ± 8* 1.43 ± 0.06 1.14 ± 0.08*

Values are means ± SE for 7 lean and 7 obese subjects at 34, 36 and 38°C and 7 lean and 5 obese subjects at 42°C

Mnet, net metabolic heat production; R + C, dry heat exchange via radiation and convection; S, heat storage; Esk, evaporative cooling from the skin; Ereq, required evaporation to maintain heat balance; w, % skin wettedness, calculated as Ereq/Emax

*

Significant group difference at P < 0.05