Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 3.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010 Aug 1;399(4):555–559. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.07.109

Table 2. Comparison of conformations of different EphA4 structures.

Structure Conformation rmsd rmsd, loops omitted Displacement D-E residue #/A (Cα) Displacement J-K residue #/A (Cα)
Our chain A closed 2.523 1.089 63/8.13 161/10.14
Our chain B open 3.478 1.268 61/7.64 159/15.39
2WO1 chain A closed 1.241 1.023 61/4.29 161/3.05
2WO1 chain B closed reference reference reference reference
3CKH chain A open? 3.025 0.969 64/7.98 156/14.12
3CKH chain B closed? 1.119 0.907 65/3.12 161/4.19
2WO2 (ephrin B2) closed 3.282 1.465 63/10.49 155/14.98
3GXU (ephrin B2) open 3.290 0.798 63/8.86 155/14.70
2WO3 (ephrin A2) open 3.080 1.019 63/8.13 155/13.01

(Question marks indicate that the model is incomplete in the region under consideration)