Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 7;30(6):1094–1099. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.42

Table 1. Physiologic measurements at all four levels of PETCO2 manipulation (mean±s.d.); statistically significant differences are denoted by asterisks (*).

Challenge Level N ΔPETCO2 (mm Hg) ΔCBF (%) ΔY (%) ΔCBF:ΔPETCO2 (%/mm Hg) ΔY:ΔCBF (%/%) Ψ (%/%) ΔCMRO2 (%)
Hypercapnia Mild 10 4.7±0.3 23.6±3.0 4.9±2.0 5.2±0.7 0.26±0.05 0.30±0.17 5.0±3.0
  Moderate 11 9.0±0.3 53.3±3.1 16.9±2.1 5.9±0.3 0.36±0.05 −0.21±0.16 −6.8±8.0
Hypocapnia Mild 10 −2.9±0.2 −13.2±2.1 −7.5±3.0 4.7±0.8 1.40±0.57 0.18±0.60 10.2±3.0
  Moderate 9 −5.8±0.3 −16.9±2.0 −12.7±2.0 5.2±0.7 0.76±0.25 −0.24±0.60 12.5±9.1
Hypocapnia versus hypercapnia P=0.004* P=0.01* P>0.99 P=0.04*
Mild versus moderate challenges P=0.29 P=0.18 P>0.99 P=0.21

CBF, cerebral blood flow; ΔCMRO2, cerebral oxidative metabolism change; PETCO2, end-tidal partial pressure of CO2.

The means were weighted by the inverse of the measurement uncertainties. No significant difference in Ψ was found between mild and moderate hypercapnia (P>0.99), or between mild and moderate hypocapnia (P>0.99). Moreover, the Ψ estimates computed from all hypercapnic (Ψ=−0.12±0.11, mean±s.d.) and from all hypocapnic (Ψ=0.06±0.30) cases did not differ significantly (P>0.99).