Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 22;12(4):R53. doi: 10.1186/bcr2612

Table 2.

Estimation of the benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen treatment

Tumor status Tamoxifen treatment versus no endocrine treatment

Distant recurrence Breast cancer death


Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Pinteraction* Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Pinteraction*
ER-positive
 Low HOXB13 expression 0.38 (0.23 to 0.60) 0.000048 0.35 (0.20 to 0.60) 0.00016
 High HOXB13 expression 0.88 (0.47 to 1.65) 0.69 0.035 0.84 (0.37 to 1.90) 0.67 0.060
ER-positive, PR-positive
 Low HOXB13 expression 0.26 (0.14 to 0.49) 0.000022 0.24 (0.11 to 0.50) 0.00015
 High HOXB13 expression 0.70 (0.31 to 1.56) 0.38 0.072 0.82 (0.27 to 2.56) 0.74 0.059
ER-positive, PR-negative
 Low HOXB13 expression 0.69 (0.31 to 1.56) 0.37 0.64 (0.26 to 1.56) 0.33
 High HOXB13 expression 0.89 (0.31 to 2.54) 0.83 0.51 0.60 (0.17 to 2.13) 0.43 0.98

Cox regression analysis of distant recurrence rate and breast cancer-related deaths for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors, ER-positive and progesterone receptor (PR)-positive tumors, and ER-positive and PR-negative tumors in relation to HOXB13 protein expression. CI, confidence interval. *Tests whether there is a difference in the treatment response. The models included treatment (tamoxifen vs. no endocrine treatment), HOXB13 expression (high vs. low), an interaction variable, tumor size (>20 mm vs. ≤20 mm) and HER2 status (3+ vs. 0 to 2+).