Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 12;11:458. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-458

Table 1.

Difference in the performance of NIGO, Full GO and GO-slim

A.
Gene Ontology Term Full GO NIGO Generic GO slim

External side of plasma membranea Not Found 0.14 Not Found

Immune response Not Found 0.14 Not Found

Antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen via MHC class I Not Found 0.170194 Not Found

Peptide antigen binding Not Found 0.176371 Not Found

MHC class I protein complex Not Found 0.186667 Not Found

Defense response Not Found 0.196994 Not Found

Bindinga Not Found 0.200462 Not Found

Positive regulation of T cell mediated cytotoxicity Not Found 0.201567 Not Found

Transporta Not Found 0.214781 Not Found

Mitochondriona Not Found 0.231303 Not Found

Antigen processing and presentation of exogenous peptide antigen via MHC class I Not Found 0.235161 Not Found

Protein self-association 0.247254 Not Found Not Found

Defense response to bacterium 0.239803 0.156774* Not Found

Response to superoxide 0.24346 0.176879* Not Found

Plasma membrane 0.246877 0.155097* 0.21

Transporter activity Not Found 0.187933* 0.21

B.

Gene Ontology Term Full GO NIGO Generic GO slim

Integral to membranea Not Found 0.16 Not Found

Regulation of cell growth Not Found 0.16 Not Found

Membranea Not Found 0.16 Not Found

Immune response Not Found 0.16 Not Found

MHC class I protein complex Not Found 0.186667 Not Found

Antigen processing & presentation Not Found 0.224 Not Found

Nucleus Not Found 0.16* 0.19

C.

Gene Ontology Term Full GO NIGO Generic GO slim

Viral capsid Not Found 0.522253 Not Found

Structural molecule activitya Not Found 0.456971 Not Found

Viral infectious cycle Not Found 0.406196 Not Found

Viral envelope Not Found 0.365577 Not Found

Plasma membrane Not Found 0.553399 Not Found

Protein binding 0.504518 Not Found Not Found

Binding 0.56242 Not Found Not Found

Structural molecule activitya Not Found 0.456971* 0.505641

External side of plasma membrane 0.744269 0.508488* Not Found

(A) Enrichment in genes with up-regulated expression in hippocampus treated with Fluoxetine, based on GEO profile GSE6476. All terms passed FDR > 0.25 and state the FDR values. (B) GEO profile GSE6675. All terms passed FDR < 0.25 and state the FDR values (Up-regulated in Control in comparison to FGF2 treatment). (C) GEO profile GSE6509 All terms passed nomPval < 0.05 and state the FDR values (Up-regulated in LPS Dmso). 'Not Found' indicates that the term was not detected by the analysis. * indicates the best FDR value for that term. a indicates terms retained in NIGO to keep the consistency of the graph's structure. indicates terms that were not included in the NIGO subset.