Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep;70(3):346–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03589.x

Table 1.

Application of ‘special circumstances’ in the appraisal of some products with incremental cost-effectiveness above £30 000 per quality adjusted life year

Topic ICER ('000s) Severity End of life* Stakeholder persuasion Significant innovation Disadvantaged population Children
Riluzole (motor neurone disease) 38–42
Trastuzumab (advanced breast cancer) 37.5
Imatinib (chronic myeloid leukaemia) 36–65
Imatinib (gastrointestinal stromal tumour)
Pemetrexed (malignant mesothelioma) 34.5
Ranizumab (age-related macular degeneration) ≫30
Omalizumab (severe asthma) >30
Sunitinib (advanced renal cancer) 50
Lenalidomide (multiple myeloma) 43
Somatotropin (growth hormone deficiency) n/a
Chronic subcutaneous insulin infusion (childhood Type 1 diabetes) n/a
*

End-of-life considerations have only been explicitly taken into account since January 2009 on the basis of supplementary advice from the Institute to the Appraisals Committee. ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (£ per quality-adjusted life year).