Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Jul;19(7):1812–1821. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0151

Table 3.

CRC tagSNP associations with nominally significant P-values

SNP Gene Cases Controls Sibships OR L95 U95 LRT P Pact
rs1677693 DHFR 1805 2878 1750 0.818 0.710 0.942 0.0041 0.0293
rs1643659 DHFR 1805 2876 1749 0.821 0.713 0.945 0.0048 0.0336
rs3788050 CBS 1796 2864 1742 0.814 0.686 0.965 0.0205 0.3137
rs4659744 MTR 1805 2878 1749 0.867 0.769 0.977 0.0225 0.1409
rs12563688 MTR 1804 2877 1748 0.871 0.773 0.982 0.0287 0.1718
rs1650723 DHFR 1803 2875 1747 0.836 0.705 0.991 0.0361 0.2040
rs12060264 MTR 1799 2862 1743 0.877 0.778 0.989 0.0381 0.2148
rs10737812 MTR 1806 2879 1750 1.137 1.008 1.282 0.0393 0.2112
rs2281649 CUBN 1806 2879 1750 1.176 1.006 1.375 0.0440 0.9591
rs719037 CBS 1804 2877 1749 0.882 0.779 0.997 0.0444 0.5264

OR’s and 95% confidence limits computed using conditional logistic regression with sibship as the matching factor and controlling for age and sex.

Adjusted for multiple testing taking into account correlated tagSNPs using a modified test of Conneely and Boehnke (Pact) (28).