TABLE 5.
Comparison between the observed values for hs and lag and the values derived from the global fita
| No. of days at 12.5% NaCl | NaCl (%) | μmax (h−1) | Observed value |
Value derived from global fit |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hs | Lag (h) | hs | Lag (h) | |||
| 1 | 2 | 0.137 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 9.5 |
| 5 | 0.100 | 0.97 | 9.7 | 1.39 | 13.9 | |
| 8 | 0.063 | 2.11 | 33.4 | 1.62 | 25.7 | |
| 10.5 | 0.027 | 2.52 | 93.7 | 2.45 | 91.1 | |
| 5 | 2 | 0.135 | 0 | 0 | 0.52 | 3.9 |
| 5 | 0.103 | 0.54 | 5.2 | 0.62 | 6 | |
| 8 | 0.060 | 3.28 | 54.7 | 0.84 | 14 | |
| 10.5 | 0.029 | 1.49 | 51.7 | 1.67 | 58 | |
| 10 | 2 | 0.143 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | 1.5 |
| 5 | 0.104 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 2.9 | |
| 8 | 0.055 | 0 | 0 | 0.53 | 9.6 | |
| 10.5 | 0.029 | 1.26 | 43.8 | 1.36 | 47.4 | |
a
Osmotic shifts across the growth boundary.