TABLE 1.
CTL specificity | E/T ratio of 1:100 |
E/T ratio of 1:1,000 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Viral spread (mean ln slope ± SEM) | Significance (P value) compared to no CTL | Viral spread (mean ln slope ± SEM) | Significance (P value) compared to no CTL | |
No CTL | 1.08 ± 0.02 | 1.40 ± 0.06 | ||
Mismatch | 1.09 ± 0.04 | NS | 1.43 ± 0.009 | NS |
Gag KK10 | 0.650 ± 0.04 | <0.001 | 1.10 ± 0.02 | <0.01 |
Pol KY9 | 0.793 ± 0.007 | <0.001 | 1.23 ± 0.05 | NS |
Vpr VL9 | 0.923 ± 0.06 | NS | 1.24 ± 0.04 | NS |
P values were calculated by using ANOVA and Bonferroni's multiple-comparison test (NS, not significant). ln slope is the natural log of the slope taken during the exponential growth phase. CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocytes.