Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct;70(4):567–579. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03734.x

Table 2.

Successful base and covariate population pharmacokinetic models for MPA

Model number Covariate Model Compared against OFV ΔOFV P
One compartment
1 Base model CL = θ1× EXP(IIV + IOV) −207.92
V = θ2× EXP(IIV)
Two compartment
2 Base model CL = θ1× EXP(IIV + IOV) 1 −457.85 −249.93 <0.001
V1 = θ2× EXP(IIV)
Q = θ3× EXP(IIV)
V2 = θ4× EXP(IIV)
3 Bodyweight on CL CL = θ1× (1 +θ7× WT/27.9) × EXP(IIV + IOV) 2 −475.25 −17.40 <0.001
V1 = θ2× EXP(IIV)
Q = θ3× EXP(IIV)
V2 = θ4× EXP(IIV)
4 Concomitant ciclosporin on CL CL = θ1× (1 +θ7× WT/27.9) × (1 +θ8× CYTA) × EXP(IIV + IOV) 3 −497.63 −22.38 <0.001
V1 = θ2× EXP(IIV)
Q = θ3× EXP(IIV)
V2 = θ4× EXP(IIV)

OFV, NONMEM derived objective function value; WT, bodyweight; CYTA, concomitant ciclosporin (CYTA = 0 if the patient taking ciclosporin, CYTA = 1 if without ciclosporin while taking tacrolimus); CL, clearance; Q, inter-compartmental clearance; V1, volume of distribution in the central compartment; V2, volume of distribution in the peripheral compartment. The population CL term was standardized to 27.9 kg, which represents the median value of weight in this study group.