Table 3.

Final multivariable dyadic model by sex of ego.

	Men (n = 1864)		Women (n = 798)
Characteristics	ORa	95% CI	OR	95% CI
Timing of interview
After group counseling (ref.)b	1.00	–	1.00	–
Before group counseling	1.98	1.28–3.07	5.11	1.99–13.09
Job
Employed (ref.)	1.00	–	1.00	–
Unemployed	1.01	0.65–1.58	0.85	0.34–2.10
Retired	3.99	1.60–9.93	9.49	1.76–51.17
Other	0.37	0.16–0.85	0.75	0.27–2.10
Monthly family income (Rs.)
≤240.00 (ref.)	1.00	–	–	–
240.00–466.67	0.86	0.49–1.49
>466.67	0.52	0.31–0.88
Circumcisedc
No (ref.)	1.00	–	–	–
Yes	0.33	0.16–0.69
Sexual orientationd
Heterosexual (ref.)	1.00	–	–	–
MSM	5.75	3.04–10.89
Sex in exchange for money or drug
No (ref.)	1.00	–	–	–
Yes	6.14	3.30–11.44
Use of any drug
No (ref.)	1.00	–	–	–
Yes	0.32	0.17–0.61
No. of regular and casual partners	–	–	0.85	0.76–0.94
Risk perception for the prior year	–	–	1.23	1.10–1.37
Alters' sexd
Female (ref.)	1.00	–	–	–
Male	2.33	1.28–4.25
Level of certainty about answers	0.82	0.74–0.91	–	–
Partner's chance to acquire HIV	–	–	1.15	1.04–1.27
Number of regular and casual partners and partner's chance to acquire HIVe
Low number of regular and casual partners and low partner's chance to acquire HIV (ref.)	1.00	–	–	–
Low number of regular and casual partners and high partner's chance to acquire HIV	2.11	1.37–3.26
High number of regular and casual partners and low partner's chance to acquire HIV	0.21	0.10–0.41
High number of regular and casual partners and high partner's chance to acquire HIV	0.08	0.03–0.20

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

^aGeneralized estimated equations.

^bRef., category of reference.

^cDefined only for men.

^dWomen who have sex with women were not included in our study.

^eNumber of regular and casual partners: high, 8; low, 1; partner's chance to acquire HIV: high, 8; low, 3.