Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010 Sep;42(3):168–175. doi: 10.1363/4216810

TABLE 3.

Odds ratios from logistic regression analyses assessing predictors of minors’ use of judicial bypass and second-trimester abortion, and coefficients from linear regressions assessing differences in mean gestational age at termination, by selected characteristics

Characteristic Judicial bypass (N=972) Second-trimester abortion (N=970) Difference in mean gestational age (wks.) (N=970)
Race/ethnicity
White (ref) 1.00 1.00 0.0
Black 0.76 (0.46–1.25) 2.79 (1.95–3.93)* 2.10 (1.56–2.64)*
Hispanic 3.74 (1.52–9.23)* 3.29 (1.35–8.01)* 2.46 (1.01–3.92)*
Other/unknown 1.83 (0.65–5.15) 1.72 (0.69–4.30) 1.47 (0.09–2.86)
Age
15 0.24 (0.12–0.49)* 0.93 (0.61–1.43) 0.16 (−0.48 to 0.80)
16 0.86 (0.53–1.38) 0.88 (0.58–1.34) −0.24 (−0.84 to 0.36)
17 (ref) 1.00 1.00 0.0
Behind in school 0.52 (0.21–1.23) 1.17 (0.96–1.42) 0.30 (–0.05 to 0.67)
Had previous birth 0.40 (0.12–1.37) 0.55 (0.24–1.26) −0.94 (−2.12 to 0.24)
Had previous abortion 0.50 (0.15–1.66) 0.68 (0.30–1.53) –0.30 (–1.39 to 0.78)
Out-of-state resident 1.90 (1.13–3.18)* 5.31 (3.63–7.77)* 3.05 (2.40–3.71)*
Year
2005 (ref) 1.00 1.00 0.0
2006 2.53 (1.31–4.89)* 0.92 (0.60–1.40) −0.09 (−0.74 to 0.56)
2007 1.78 (0.89–3.58) 0.74 (0.47–1.17) −0.24 (−0.90 to 0.43)
Used judicial bypass na 0.45 (0.23–0.89)* −1.11 (−1.97 to −0.25)*
c2(8) 3.0 6.15 na
R2 na na 0.14
*

p<.05.

Indicates that a minor was two or more years behind expected grade level, given her age.

Notes: Figures in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals. Chi-square statistics represent the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit. ref=reference category. na=not applicable.