Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Transplant. 2010 Dec;14(8):944–953. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01349.x

Table 3.

Correlations between TRS, Participant Age and Adherence Measures

Age Rate of Attendance Cyclosporine SD IS Out of Range IS Below Range
Age r =−0.26; p =0.03 r =0.78; p =0.005 r = 0.25; p =0.03 -
Adolescent TRS
Total Score rs =0.51; p =0.000 - - - -
Self-Management rs =0.44; p =0.000 - rs =0.72; p =0.01 - rs =0.27; p =0.02
 Allocation of Responsibility Subscale rs =0.44; p =0.000 - rs =0.68; p =0.02 - rs =0.23; p =0.05
Perceived Regimen Knowledge rs =0.46; p =0.000 - - - -
Demonstrated Skills - - - - -
Psychosocial Adjustment rs =0.51; p =0.000 - - - -
Parent TRS
Total Score rs =0.43; p =0.001 - - - -
Adolescent Self-Management rs =0.44; p =0.001 - - - -
 Allocation of Responsibility Subscale rs = 0.43; p =0.001 - - - -
Adolescent Regimen Knowledge rs =0.42; p =0.001 - - - -
Demonstrated Skills Adolescent - - - - -
Psychosocial Adjustment rs =0.29; p =0.026 - - - -
Regimen Knowledge - rs =0.40; p =0.002 - - -