. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: Merrill Palmer Q (Wayne State Univ Press). 2010 Jul;56(3):303–332. doi: 10.1353/mpq.0.0055

Table 3.

Results of selected hierarchical linear models for change in peer victimization across elementary school (N = 218)

		Model
		A	B	C	D	E	F
Fixed effects		Coefficient (SE)	Coefficient (SE)	Coefficient (SE)	Coefficient (SE)	Coefficient (SE)	Coefficient (SE)
Intercept (Kindergarten)		0.134^*** (0.0063)	0.142^*** (0.0122)	0.134^*** (0.0063)	0.133^*** (0.0063)	0.035 (0.0860)	0.140^*** (0.0121)
K Friend Status (friended)			0.012 (0.0142)			0.136 (0.1183)	−0.010 (0.0142)
K Teacher Conflict				0.002^* (0.0006)		0.005 (0.0038)
K Maternal Directiveness					0.021^** (0.0079)	0.060 (0.0417)	0.020^* (0.0078)
Conflict by Directiveness						−0.002 (0.0015)
Conflict by Friend Status						−0.006 (0.0049)
Friend Status by Directiveness						−0.062 (0.0507)
Friend Status by Directiveness by Conflict						0.002 (0.002)
Slope (Grade)		−0.013^*** (0.0022)	−0.006 (0.0042)	−0.013^*** (0.0022)	−0.013^*** (0.0021)	−0.006 (0.0042)	−0.006 (0.0042)
K Friend Status (friended)			−0.009⁺ (0.0049)			−0.010^* (0.0049)	−0.009⁺ (0.0049)
Variance Components		Variance	Variance	Variance	Variance	Variance	Variance
Level 1	Within person	0.0094	0.0094	0.0094	0.0094	0.0093	0.0094
Level 2	Initial Status	0.0030^***	0.0031^***	0.0029^***	0.0028^***	0.0028^***	0.0028^***
	Rate of Change	0.00014^*	0.00014^*	0.00014^*	0.00014^*	0.00014^*	0.00013^*
Goodness-of-Fit
Deviance		−1151.91	−1162.66	−1158.31	−1159.01	−1173.47	−1168.89

Note: Model A = Unconditional Growth; Model B = Final Model with Friend Status; Model C = Final Model with Student-Teacher Conflict; Model D = Final Model with Maternal Directiveness; Model E = Full Model with three relationship variables (as suggested by previous models), Model F (best fitting final model);

⁺

p<.06

p < .05,

^**

p < .01,

^***

p < .001