Table 5.
Classification performance on the Meats data for the variable selection algorithm with updating and for previous analyses of these data after combining the chicken and turkey into a poultry group. Mean classification performance for the 50 random splits of the data are reported with standard deviations in parentheses.
| Method | Misclassification Rate |
|---|---|
| Variable Selection and Updating | 0.8% (1.3) |
| Variable Selection (Greedy) and Updating | 0.7% (0.7) |
| Variable Selection Only | 1.8% (3.2) |
| Dean et al. (2006) | 1.0% (0.9) |
| McElhinney et al. (1999) | 2.6–4.3% |
| Transductive SVMs | 20.9% (8.0) |
| Random Forests | 10.5% (3.3) |
| AdaBoost.M1 | 14.7% (3.7) |
| Bayesian Multinomial Regression | 17.2% (4.9) |