Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Appl Stat. 2010 Mar 1;4(1):396–421. doi: 10.1214/09-AOAS279

Table 5.

Classification performance on the Meats data for the variable selection algorithm with updating and for previous analyses of these data after combining the chicken and turkey into a poultry group. Mean classification performance for the 50 random splits of the data are reported with standard deviations in parentheses.

Method Misclassification Rate
Variable Selection and Updating 0.8% (1.3)
Variable Selection (Greedy) and Updating 0.7% (0.7)
Variable Selection Only 1.8% (3.2)
Dean et al. (2006) 1.0% (0.9)
McElhinney et al. (1999) 2.6–4.3%
Transductive SVMs 20.9% (8.0)
Random Forests 10.5% (3.3)
AdaBoost.M1 14.7% (3.7)
Bayesian Multinomial Regression 17.2% (4.9)