Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Appl Stat. 2010 Mar 1;4(1):396–421. doi: 10.1214/09-AOAS279

Table 7.

Classification performance on the Olive Oil data for the variable selection algorithm with updating and for previous analyses of these data. Mean classification performance for the 50 random splits of the data are reported with standard deviations in parentheses. For the Variable Selection Only results, the maximum number of selected wavelengths was restricted to be six to avoid degeneracies.

Method Misclassification Rate
Variable Selection and Updating 6.9% (5.4)
Variable Selection (Greedy) and Updating 16.6% (11.3)
Variable Selection Only 17.9% (10.9)
Dean et al. (2006) 11.9% (6.3)
Downey et al. (2003) 6.1–19.0%
Transductive SVMs 12.4% (7.5)
Random Forests 19.3% (6.5)
AdaBoost.M1 34.1% (9.3)
Bayesian Multinomial Regression 57.0% (1.2)