Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun;12(5):325–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00171.x

Table 2.

The significance of involved surgical margins and preoperative body composition measures for women and men with pancreatic cancer

Body composition measures Margin status Women
Men
P for multivariate analysis
n Mean SEM n Mean SEM
Weight, kg Involved 6 53.8 3.5 7 69.2 6.1 0.015
Clear 15 62.2 2.6 8 86 6.9
TBN, g Involved 6 1264 92 7 1993 189 0.045
Clear 15 1385 62 8 2531 238
NI units Involved 6 1.01 0.07 7 0.96 0.08 NS
Clear 15 0.99 0.03 8 1.16 0.1
%BFat, % Involved 6 26.3a 2.9 7 22.8a 1.8 0.004
Clear 15 35 1.7 8 29.2 2.1
FM, kg Involved 6 14.5a 2.3 7 16.4 2.8 0.005
Clear 15 22.1 1.8 8 25.9 4
TBW, kg Involved 6 25.8a 1.2 7 35.9 2.4 0.019
Clear 15 29.1 0.7 8 39.1 1.3
BMI, g/h2 Involved 6 23.2 1.4 7 23.1 2.1 NS
Clear 15 24.6 0.8 8 27.7 2.1
TBK, g Involved 6 65.3b 4.1 7 120.7 10.5 0.014
Clear 15 79.8 3.1 8 138.5 7.3
TBK/Ht, g/m Involved 6 0.43a 0.02 7 0.7 0.06 0.02
Clear 15 0.5 0.02 8 0.79 0.04
LBM, kg Involved 6 34.4a 2 7 52 3.2 0.009
Clear 15 39.6 1.2 8 60.1 3.3

P for multivariate analysis used the GLM program with sex as a fixed factor

Comparison of means within sex subgroup using t-test:

a

P < 0.05;

b

P < 0.001

SEM, standard error of the mean; NS, not significant; TBN, total body nitrogen; NI, nitrogen index, %BFat, percentage body fat; FM, fat mass; TBW, total body water; BMI, body mass index; TBK, total body potassium; TBK/Ht, total body potassium/height; LBM, lean body mass