Table 5.
Osmotic, pH, and chemical sensitivities of wild-type E. coli O157:H7 strains
Mode of Action | Substrate(s) | 43894 | Sakai | WSU180 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Osmotic sensitivity |
4% Sodium Lactate | + | − | − |
pH, decarboxylase |
pH 4.5 + L-Norvaline | + | − | − |
pH 4.5 + a- Amino-N-Butyric Acid | + | − | − | |
pH 4.5 + 5-Hydroxy-L-Lysine | + | − | − | |
pH 4.5 + Urea | + | − | − | |
pH 4.5 + b-Hydroxy Glutamate | + | − | + | |
pH 4.5 + D,L Diamino-Pimelic Acid | + | + | − | |
pH, deaminase | pH 9.5 + Agmatine | + | − | + |
pH 9.5 + L-Homoarginine | + | + | − | |
Chemical sensitivity |
Cefoxitin, Disulphiram, Methyltrioctylammonium Chloride, Polymyxin B |
− | − | + |
Ciprofloxacin | − | + | − | |
Chloroxylenol, Orphenadrine, Oxolinic acid | − | + | + | |
1-Chloro-2,4-Dinitrobenzene Piperacillin, Sodium Orthovanadate |
− | + | ++ | |
Furaltadone | − | ++ | − | |
2- Phenylphenol | − | +++ | − | |
2,2`-Dipyridyl, 2-Nitroimidazole, 3, 4- Dimethoxybenzyl alcohol, 5,7-Dichloro-8- hydroxyquinoline, 5-Fluoro-5'-deoxyuridine, Captan, Capreomycin, Cefmetazole, Cupric chloride, D,L- Methionine, Hydroxamate, D,L-Serine, Hydroxamate, D-Cycloserine, Gallic Acid, Lithium Chloride, Neomycin, Phleomycin, Procaine, Sodium Nitrite, Tobramycin, Tolylfluanid, Umbelliferone |
+ | − | − | |
2,4-Dintrophenol, Blasticidin S, Colistin, Proflavine, Thioridazine, Thiosalicylate, Trifluoperazine |
+ | − | + | |
18-Crown-6-Ether, Cobalt chloride, L-Aspartic-b- Hydroxamate, Sanguinarine |
+ | + | − | |
Tinidazole | + | ++ | − | |
Amoxicillin, Chlorhexidine, Chromium Chloride, Guanidine hydrochloride, Hydroxylamine, Phenyl- Methyl-Sulfonyl-Fluoride (PMSF), Protamine Sulfate, Sisomicin |
++ | − | − | |
Ethionamide | ++ | − | + | |
Geneticin (G418) | ++ | − | + | |
5-Azacytidine, Semicarbazide hydrochloride, Troleandomycin |
++ | + | − | |
Aluminum Sulfate, Dihydrostreptomycin | +++ | − | − | |
Kanamycin | +++ | + | − | |
Zinc chloride | +++ | + | + |
bacteria grew the same or less than the negative control which was a well without substrate
bacteria grew 1- to 2-fold more than the negative control
bacterial grew 2- to 3-fold more than the negative control
bacteria grew >3-fold more than the negative control