Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov;100(11):2228–2234. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.176230

TABLE 3.

Effectiveness of the Intervention by Intent-to-Treat Analysis: Filipino Health Study, Los Angeles, CA, 2004–2009

Screened During Follow-Up Period (Self-Report), No. (%) OR (95% CI) P
Intervention with FOBT kit (n = 202) 61 (30) 4.9 (2.4, 9.9) < .001
Intervention without FOBT kit (n = 183) 45 (25) 3.7 (1.8, 7.5) < .001
Control (Ref) (n = 163) 14 (9)

Note. CI = confidence interval; FOBT = fecal occult blood test; OR = odds ratio. Analyses were conducted by using mixed effects logistic regression with random intercepts for organization and session within organization and adjustment for language of baseline interview.