TABLE 3.
Men |
Women |
|||||
Monthly Mediana | RRb (95% CI) | Prevented, No.c | Monthly Mediana | RRb (95% CI) | Prevented, No.c | |
Overall | 7903 | 0.95* (0.90, 1.00) | 7720 | 4158 | 0.96 (0.91, 1.02) | 2787 |
Injury severity | ||||||
Slight | 6169 | 0.96 (0.91, 1.02) | 4494 | 3483 | 0.98 (0.92, 1.04) | 1706 |
Serious | 1430 | 0.89*** (0.83, 0.95) | 2699 | 551 | 0.88** (0.81, 0.96) | 1074 |
Fatal | 267 | 0.89* (0.81, 0.98) | 471 | 76 | 1.02 (0.86, 1.20) | −16 |
Type of road user | ||||||
Car user | 4052 | 0.96 (0.89, 1.03) | 2977 | 2750 | 0.98 (0.91, 1.06) | 955 |
Car user—serious or fatal injury | 823 | 0.88** (0.80, 0.97) | 1488 | 383 | 0.91 (0.82, 1.01) | 514 |
Motorcycle user | 815 | 0.96 (0.88, 1.04) | 1071 | 143 | 1.00 (0.89, 1.11) | 13 |
Motorcycle user—serious or fatal injury | 207 | 0.94 (0.84, 1.05) | 360 | 23 | 1.21 (0.92, 1.58) | −100 |
Moped user | 1349 | 0.92* (0.87, 0.98) | 1736 | 459 | 0.91* (0.84, 0.99) | 714 |
Moped user—serious or fatal injury | 270 | 0.88** (0.80, 0.97) | 513 | 56 | 0.87 (0.71, 1.04) | 127 |
Pedestrians | 499 | 0.96 (0.88, 1.04) | 341 | 476 | 0.97 (0.89, 1.05) | 300 |
Pedestrians—serious or fatal injury | 152 | 0.91 (0.81, 1.01) | 241 | 121 | 0.88* (0.79, 0.98) | 265 |
Road type | ||||||
Urban roads | 3605 | 0.93* (0.87, 0.99) | 4604 | 1981 | 0.96 (0.89, 1.02) | 1626 |
Urban roads—serious or fatal injury | 451 | 0.87*** (0.81, 0.94) | 1048 | 193 | 0.95 (0.84, 1.06) | 176 |
Nonurban roads | 4317 | 0.96 (0.90, 1.03) | 3154 | 2119 | 0.97 (0.89, 1.06) | 1169 |
Nonurban roads—serious or fatal injury | 1239 | 0.90** (0.83, 0.97) | 2155 | 426 | 0.88* (0.79, 0.98) | 847 |
Notes. CI = confidence interval. The preintervention period was January 1, 2000, to June 30, 2006; the postintervention period was July 1, 2006, to December 31, 2007.
Monthly median number of people injured in road traffic collisions.
Adjusted by time trend, seasonality, and for the effect of prioritization of road safety in Spain in the year 2004.
Negative numbers indicate an excess of people injured in the postintervention period compared with the expected numbers had the intervention not been implemented.
*P < .05; **P ≤ .01; ***P ≤ .001.