Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jun 30;149(3):177–184. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00241

Appendix Table 5.

Head-to-Head Comparisons of Sensitivity of QuantiFERON-TB (QFT) Gold versus T-SPOT.TB among Patients with Active Tuberculosis (TB)

Study, Year
(Reference)
Industry
Supported?*
Sample Setting Patients with Active (Culture-Confirmed) TB, n (%) Sensitivity Difference between T-SPOT.TB and QFT Gold Sensitivity, percentage points
Patients with Positive QFT Gold Result, n (%) Patients with Positive T-SPOT.TB Result, n (%)
Lee et al., 2006 (11) Yes Predominantly adults South Korea 87 (63) 61 (70) 83 (95) 25
Ferrara et al., 2006 (12) Yes Predominantly adults Italy 24 (NR) 17 (71) 20 (83) 12
Goletti et al., 2006 (13) Yes Predominantly adults Italy 23 (100) 19 (83) 21 (91) 8
Kang et al., 2007 (17) Yes Adults South Korea 67 (100) 58 (87) 59 (92) 5
Soysal et al., 2008 (19) NR Predominantly adults Turkey 100 (100) 77 (77) 80 (80) 3
Domínguez et al., 2008 (23) Yes Adults and children§ Spain 42 (NR) 33 (79)|| 36 (86) 7
Detjen et al., 2007 (25) No Children Germany 28 (100) 26 (93)|| 26 (93) 0

NR = not reported.

*

“Industry support” refers to any industry involvement or support (e.g., sponsorship, donation of test kits, participation in advisory boards, and involvement of test developers or ownership of patents).

Indeterminate results were not excluded in calculating sensitivity estimates.

QFT Gold.

§

Children formed 27% of the sample.

||

QFT Gold In-Tube.