Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 9;285(42):32242–32250. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.160820

TABLE 1.

Effect of vinblastine on microtubule dynamics in prophase CHO cells

Values shown represent the mean ± S.E.

Interphase
Prophase
0 0 5 35 nm
Growth
    Rate (μm/min) 16.2 ± 0.8 17.1 ± 1.6 9.9 ± 0.7a 12.3 ± 1.0a
    Distance (μm) 3.2 ± 0.4 2.5 ± 0.3 0.9 ± 0.1a 1.3 ± 0.1a
    Duration (sec) 12.2 ± 1.2 9.0 ± 0.6 5.4 ± 0.3a 6.4 ± 0.3a

Shortening
    Rate (μm/min) 28.2 ± 2.3 24.6 ± 2.0 13.5 ± 1.5a 13.9 ± 0.9a
    Distance (μm) 5.2 ± 0.6 3.3 ± 0.4 1.4 ± 0.1a 1.6 ± 0.1a
    Duration (sec) 11.2 ± 1.1 8.7 ± 0.9 6.3 ± 0.3a 6.7 ± 0.3a

% Time
    Growth 31.1 ± 2.2 36.0 ± 2.4 12.2 ± 1.8a 15.9 ± 2.1a
    Shortening 21.1 ± 1.9 33.0 ± 2.8 14.0 ± 0.8a 16.3 ± 1.7a
    Pause 47.8 ± 3.1 31.0 ± 3.9 73.8 ± 3.9a 67.7 ± 3.3a

Frequency (min−1)
    Catastropheb 1.5 ± 0.1 3.4 ± 0.3 1.6 ± 0.1a 1.8 ± 0.2a
    Rescuec 6.3 ± 0.5 6.0 ± 0.5 9.3 ± 0.9a 9.4 ± 0.5a
Dynamicityd (μm/min) 9.0 ± 0.9 13.8 ± 1.4 3.1 ± 0.4a 4.2 ± 0.6a
Number of microtubules 30 12 8 15

a p < 0.05 compared to 0 concentration in prophase cells.

b The transition from growth or pause to shortening.

c The transition from shortening to growth or pause.

d The total change of length per unit time of individual microtubules during their life histories.