Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Feb 17;57(6):1335–1347. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2041002

TABLE II.

Results From Selected Four Subjects in First Experimental Dataset.

Subject Epoch P-value KS dist. (linear→nonlin.)
11 control, supine 0.020 0.0755→0.0573
11 control, upright 0.166 0.04240.0517
11 ATR, supine 0.004 0.1085→0.1004
11 ATR, upright 0.002 0.1202→0.1.135
11 DB, supine 0.018 0.1442→0.0805
11 DB, upright 0.156 0.1684→0.1374
15 control, supine 0.090 0.05900.0709
15 control, upright 0.132 0.0765→0.0927
15 ATR, supine 0.138 0.1277→0.0914
15 ATR, upright 0.128 0.1339→0.1191
15 DB, supine 0.288 0.1584→0.1087
15 DB, upright 0.230 0.1540→0.0940
20 control, supine 0.012 0.04160.0406
20 control, upright 0.136 0.05990.0354
20 PROP, supine 0.230 0.0994→0.0793
20 PROP, upright 0.142 0.0994→0.0570
20 DB, supine <1e-8 0.1026→0.0684
20 DB, upright 0.004 0.1010→0.1269
21 control, supine 0.178 0.1343→0.1161
21 control, upright 0.208 0.0713→0.0578
21 PROP, supine 0.232 0.05060.0279
21 PROP, upright 0.012 0.1337→0.1227
21 DB, supine 0.094 0.1130→0.1063
21 DB, upright 0.430 0.1087→0.1017

P-values are obtained from the nonlinearity test. The numbers in bold font indicate the KS fit is within the 95% confidence bound. The tick indicates an improvement of fit by inclusion of nonlinearity.