Table 7.
| Product | Ligand | % Conv. |
|---|---|---|
|
--- | 7c |
| BQ | 3c | |
| Ac-Ile-OH | >99 (96) | |
|
--- | 25c |
| BQ | 7c | |
| Ac-Ile-OH | 98 (97) | |
|
--- | 2 |
| BQ | 1 | |
| Ac-Ile-OH | >99 (98) | |
|
--- | 64 |
| BQ | 9 | |
| Ac-Ile-OH | 88 (83)d | |
|
--- | 93 (92) |
| BQ | 12 | |
| Ac-Ile-OH | >99 (95) | |
|
--- | 6 |
| BQ | 2 | |
| Ac-Ile-OH | >99 (99) | |
|
--- | 8e |
| BQ | 3e | |
| Ac-Ile-OH | >99 (99)e | |
|
--- | 0 |
| BQ | 0 | |
| Ac-Ile-OH | 72 (70)f | |
|
--- | 10 |
| BQ | 5 | |
| Ac-Ile-OH | >99 (98) | |
|
--- | 44g |
| BQ | 23 | |
| Ac-Ile-OH | >99 (94) |
5 mol% BQ (when used), 10 mol% Ac-Ile-OH (when used).
The conversion was determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture. Isolated yield is given in parentheses.
Average of three trials.
An additional 11% of the di-ortho-olefinated product was observed by 1H NMR.
6 h.
An additional 6% of the decarboxylated product was formed.
An additional 4% of a positional isomer was formed.
