Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Human Behav. 2010 Nov 1;26(6):1327–1335. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.006

Table 5.

Multiple Regression Analyses Predicting Whether Differences in Demographics Account for Differences Between Online and Phone Samples in Scores on the PCL and Social Support Scales

Variable B SEB β
PCL Total Score
Currently in a Relationship1 −7.70 1.80 −.19***
African American2 3.33 1.29 .11**
Disability3 1.33 0.50 .11**
Sample Type4 −0.98 0.72 −.06

PCL Avoidance Subscale
Currently in a Relationship1 −3.96 .74 −.23***
African American2 1.31 .53 .11*
Disability3 0.50 .21 .10*
Sample Type4 −.41 .30 −.06

PCL Hyperarousal Subscale
Currently in a Relationship1 −1.63 .57 −.13**
Disability3 0.36 .16 .10*
Sample Type4 −0.37 .23 −.07

Social Support
Currently in a Relationship1 235.16 47.02 .21***
Disability3 −53.82 22.87 −.10*
Type of Sample4 101.30 18.77 .23***
1

Currently in a Relationship: 1 = Yes, 0 = No.

2

African American: 1 = Yes, 0 = No.

3

Disability: 1 = Either respondent and/or his partner had a disability, 0 = Neither respondent nor his reported had a disability.

4

Sample Type: 1 = Online, 2 = Phone.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.