Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2010 Nov;17(11):1334–1344. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.06.004

Table 3.

Average 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and total registration time measured for the two liver registration methods for five patient datasets. The first method was a direct registration of pre-procedure MR to the intra-procedure CT images, while the second method used the transformation obtained from CT to CT registration to deform and register the MR image.

Registered Images Method 1
Method 2
95% HD (mm) DSC Time (min) 95% HD (mm) DSC Time (min)
MR – Planning CT 3.29 0.97 19.2 3.29 0.97 19.2
MR – Targeting CT 3.9 0.94 10.2 3.5 0.96 4.6
MR – Monitoring CT 3.9 0.93 10.4 4 0.96 4.3