Table 3.
Average 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and total registration time measured for the two liver registration methods for five patient datasets. The first method was a direct registration of pre-procedure MR to the intra-procedure CT images, while the second method used the transformation obtained from CT to CT registration to deform and register the MR image.
| Registered Images | Method 1 |
Method 2 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95% HD (mm) | DSC | Time (min) | 95% HD (mm) | DSC | Time (min) | |
| MR – Planning CT | 3.29 | 0.97 | 19.2 | 3.29 | 0.97 | 19.2 |
| MR – Targeting CT | 3.9 | 0.94 | 10.2 | 3.5 | 0.96 | 4.6 |
| MR – Monitoring CT | 3.9 | 0.93 | 10.4 | 4 | 0.96 | 4.3 |