Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 12.
Published in final edited form as: Parasitology. 2008 May 12;135(7):767–781. doi: 10.1017/S0031182008000395

Table 1.

Factors influencing the probability of an individual field vole becoming infected with B. microti showing the best model for (a) all captures conforming to inclusion criteria described in text and (b) all such captures where the animal was also caught in the preceding month. ΔAIC=the change in the AIC if the single term is dropped. σ2=the variance attributable to a random effect. sd=standard deviation of σ2

Term Coefficient (SE) z-value P-value ΔAIC
(a) Model for all captures
Intercept −6.21 (1.40) −4.45 <0.001
Weight 0.45 (0.14) 3.22 0.001
Weight^2 −0.01 (0.003) −2.68 0.007 7.6
Recaptured −1.16 (0.29) −4.04 <0.001 18.9
Ticks 0.09 (0.04) 2.50 0.012 3.6
A. phagocytophilum 0.89 (0.37) 2.40 0.016 3.0
Random effect: site * session σ2=0.37; sd=0.61
Random effect: tag σ2=0.61; sd=0.78
(b) Model for data of animals caught in preceding month
Intercept −0.12 (1.34) −0.09 0.93
Weight −0.14 (0.07) −2.06 0.039 3.5
A. phagocytophilum 2.16 (0.63) 3.41 <0.001 8.8
A. phagocytophilum last session 2.11 (0.59) 3.60 <0.001 9.4
Random effect: site * session σ2=1.37; sd=1.17