Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 29;2010:837950. doi: 10.4061/2010/837950

Table 1.

The proportions of herd in each category of each variable investigated during the study (May 2003–January 2004).

Variable Categories No. of herds (%)

Traditional (n = 25) Smallholder dairy (n = 105)
Sex† Male 22 (9) 25 (6)
Female 223 (91) 384 (94)
Brought in animals from previous years Yes 5 (21) 29 (27.6)
No 20 (79) 76 (72.4)
Grazing history Zero grazing 0 (0) 76 (72.4)
Semi/free grazing 25 (100) 29 (27.6)
Herd location Periurban 5 (20) 37 (35.2)
Urban 5 (20) 53 (50.5)
Rural 15 (60) 15 (14.3)
Breeding system* Own bull 13 (52) 13 (12.4)
Bull from outside 12 (48) 60 (57.7)
AI 0 (0) 67 (63.8)
Water source* Tap 4 (16) 87 (82.8)
Rain water 19 (76) 35 (33.3)
Shallow wells 1 (4) 11 (10.5)
River 18 (72) 16 (15.2)
Pond 11 (44) 23 (22.0)
History of abortion Yes 3 (12) 4 (3.7)
No 22 (88) 105 (96.3)
Disposal of afterbirth Yes 8 (32) 95 (90.5)
No 17 (68) 10 (9.5)
Cattle going to water source Yes 25 (100) 23 (22.0)
No 0 (0) 82 (78.0)
Education level Illiterate 22 (88) 63 (60)
Above primary 3 (12) 42 (40)
Other training: livestock keeping Yes 4 (16) 70 (66.6)
No 21 (84) 35 (33.3)
Source of fodder* Road side Na 75 (71.4)
Own established Na 27 (25.7)
Bought in hay Na 12 (11.4)
Contact with other animals* Dairy to dairy 0 ( 0) 86 (82)
Dairy to zebu 17 (68) 19 (18)
Contact sheep/goat 22 (88) 0 (0)
Contact pigs 0 (0) 25 (23.8)
Contact game 9 (36) 2 (1.90029
Place of contact* Pasture 23 (92) 29 (27.6)
Watering point 24 (96) 26 (24.8)
Dip 6 (24) 22 (20.9)
Mating 1 (4) 28 (26.6)
Housing (shoats) 17 (68) 17 (16.2)

*Proportion do not add up to 100% each category was treated as a binary variable; AI: Artificial insemination.

Na: not applicable;

†Sample size (traditional, n = 246; smallholder, n = 409).