Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 18;48(10):3593–3599. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00430-10

TABLE 3.

All spoligotypes in different patient types

Cluster or unique spoligotype No. of isolates in patient study group
Total
Urban treatment failures Urban new cases Rural new cases
C1 8 62 7 77
C2 8 22 30
C3 1 2 2 5
C4 8 2 10
C5 8 8
C6 1 1 2
C7 1 9 1 11
C8 5 5
C9 2 2
C10 2 3 5
C11 1 17 18
C12 1 15 2 18
C13 2 2
C14 2 2
C15 14 168 38 220
C16 2 1 3
C17 2 2 1 5
C18 1 1 2
C19 2 2
C20 3 3
C21 2 2
C22 3 1 4
C23 3 3
C24 6 30 1 37
C25 2 2
C26 2 2
C27 3 3
C28 2 2
C29 2 2
C30 3 3
C31 1 2 3
C32 1 3 4
C33 2 2
C34 3 1 4
C35 2 2
C36 3 3
C37 4 3 7
C38 4 4
C39 4 4
C40 1 2 3
C41 4 4
C42 3 3
C43 3 3
C44 2 2
C45 4 4
C46 2 2
C47 4 4 8
C48 2 2
C49 1 5 1 7
C50 1 1 2
C51 1 1 2
C52 1 3 4
C53 1 4 3 8
C54 2 2
C55 1 1 2
C56 1 1 2
C57 2 2
C58 2 2
Unique spoligotype 24 188 34 246
Total 77 646 110 833