TABLE 3.
Inhibition zone diameters and terbinafine MICs of 19 strains tested in the studya
| Species | Isolate | Mean IZD ± SE (mm) | MIC (μg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| T. mentagrophytes | MRL 12523 | 70.33 ± 0.52 | 0.016 |
| MRL 12528 | 70.33 ± 2.74 | 0.008 | |
| MRL 12539 | 67.67 ± 1.37 | 0.008 | |
| MRL 12680 | 69.67 ± 2.25 | 0.016 | |
| MRL 12692 | 70.67 ± 1.03 | 0.004 | |
| MRL 12719 | 70.00 ± 1.79 | 0.004 | |
| MRL 12860 | 67.00 ± 4.65 | 0.008 | |
| MRL 12870 | 70.67 ± 1.03 | 0.004 | |
| MYA 4439b | 71.00 ± 0.89 | 0.004 | |
| T. rubrum | MRL 475 | 0 | 4 |
| MRL 476 | 0 | 4 | |
| MRL 479 | 0 | 4 | |
| MRL 11200 | 0 | 32 | |
| MYA 4438b | 0 | 4 | |
| MRL 17960 | 68.00 ± 2.37 | 0.008 | |
| MRL 17964 | 51.33 ± 3.61 | 0.008 | |
| MRL 17966 | 66.67 ± 1.86 | 0.004 | |
| MRL 17967 | 67.67 ± 2.25 | 0.004 | |
| MRL 17968 | 68.00 ± 1.79 | 0.008 |
Each drug testing was performed with fresh inoculum in triplicate on three different days.
ATCC designation.