Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 25;84(21):10974–10981. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00502-10

TABLE 2.

Comparison of quantum (maximal) yields of IFN and relative efficiency of IFN induction

rgTK/OR/71 designationa No. of aa residues of NS1 protein (1-X. . .Y)b QY of IFN (U/1.0 × 107 cells) No. of IFPs inducing the QY of IFN IFN yield (U/106 PFP) Relative IFN induction efficiencyc
Wild type 1-230 4,000 1.0 × 107d 400 1.0
D-del pc2 (vac)e 1-115. . .125 14,000 1.0 × 107d 1,400 3.5
D-del pc1 (vac)e 1-80. . .90 17,000 1.0 × 107d 1,700 4.3
D-del pc4 (vac+)e 1-91. . .93 42,500 5.4 × 106f 8,000 20.0
D-del pc3 (vac+)e 1-69. . .86 72,000 5.4 × 106f 13,300 33.3
a

See footnote a in Table 1.

b

See footnote b in Table 1.

c

Calculated relative to the IFN U/106 IFP value for the wild-type virus.

d

The lowest number of IFPs required to infect all (i.e., 1.0 × 107) cells in order to induce a QY of IFN for type r ≥ 1 dose-response curves.

e

Arranged in the order of increasing effectiveness as LAIV on the basis of the titer of antibodies against heterologous virus that they induced (44).

f

The number of IFPs infecting 27% (i.e., 2.7 × 106) of the cells in order to induce a QY of IFN for type r = 2 dose-response curves. Each of these cells is infected with 2 IFPs. The total number of IFPs contributing to the QY equals 5.4 × 106. See Materials and Methods for calculations.