Table 1.
Algorithm performance for 20, 50 and 100 iterations. Cardiac region volume for 50 and 100 iterations were not significantly different from expert manual quantification.
Iterations | Time (sec) | Overlap (Dice Coefficient) |
Cardiac region volume difference (%) from expert |
Overlap central 70% cardiac region (Dice coefficient) |
---|---|---|---|---|
20 | 12.8 ± 2.1 | 0.80 ± 0.10 | 13.7 ± 11.7 (p=0.04*) | 0.87 ± 0.09 |
50 | 23.1 ± 3.7 | 0.86 ± 0.05 | 6.7 ± 5.2 (p=0.7, NS) | 0.92 ± 0.03 |
100 | 39.0 ± 7.4 | 0.89 ± 0.01 | 3.8 ± 3.0 (p=0.1, NS)) | 0.94 ± 0.01 |