Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Transplant. 2010 Nov;24(6):784–793. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01200.x

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of surveyed students

Control Intervention p value c
n = 91 n = 96
Mean age (S.D.) 16.6±1.4 15.9 ±1.3 <0.01
Percent Males 67.0 62.5 0.43
Language spoken at home 0.74
 English only (%) 76 (83.5) 69 (71.9)
 Bi-lingual 12 (13.2) 17 (17.7)
 Not English 3 (3.3) 8 (8.3)
 Missing 0 2 (2.1)
Father’s education (%) 0.13
 High School or less 22 (24.2) 29 (30.2)
 Some college or less 49 (53.9) 38 (39.6)
 Don’t know/No response 20 (22.0) 29 (30.2)
Mother’s education (%) 0.04
 High School or less 20 (22.0) 27 (28.1)
 Some college or more 59 (64.8) 45 (46.9)
 Don’t know/no response 12 (13.2) 24 (25.0)
Plan to attend college (%) 87 (95.6) 89 (92.7) 0.77
Ethnicity (%)a
 African American 38 (41.8) 46 (47.9) 0.62
 European American 40 (44.0) 22 (22.9) <0.01
 Asian Americanb 27 (29.7) 30 (31.3) 0.80
 American Indian 9 (9.9) 9 (9.4) 0.92
 Hispanic American 2 (2.2) 5 (5.2) 0.49
 Pacific Islander 1 (1.1) 3 (3.1) 0.49
 African 2 (2.2) 2 (2.1) 0.96
 Middle Eastern 2 (2.2) 0 (0) 0.21
 Alaska Native 1 (1.1) 1 (1.0) 0.92
a

The sum of the percentages exceeds 100 since selection of more than one ethnicity was permissible.

b

Includes students self-identified as Chinese, Japanese, Korean, South Asian, Southeast Asian, and/or Filipino American.

c

p value compares the mean values in each category between control and intervention groups (age: two-tailed t-test; other categories: Pearson’s chi square statistic).