Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Attach Hum Dev. 2010 Nov;12(6):567–585. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2010.501988

Table 3.

Results of standard linear regressions testing unique variance in maternal caregiving behavior accounted for by mentalisation involving self versus mentalisations involving child (N = 47)

Sensitivity to Cues Response to Distress Social-Emotional Growth Cognitive Growth

Total Contingent Total Contingent Total Contingent Total Contingent

R2a β b R2a β b R2a β b R2a β b R2a β b R2a β b R2a β b R2a β b
Child age .03 .17 .01 .08 .08* -.30* .05 -.24 .02 -.15 .00 .07 .04 .20 .06 .26
Child gender .03 .16 .01 -.13 .00 .00 .00 -.01 .02 -.16 .00 -.07 .12a -.36a .04 -.22
Maternal depression .02 -.16 .02 .16 .03 -.20 .00 -.03 .01 -.11 .04 -.24 .01 .10 .00 .03
Self-focused RF .10* .37* .07 .31 .00 .01 .06 -.28 .08* .33* .05 .27 .08* .34* .10* .37*
Child-focused RF .01 -.08 .00 -.07 .02 -.18 .00 -.01 .05 .25 .05 .25 .00 -.02 .00 .06
a

Unique R2

b

Standardized beta weights

p < .10

*

p < .05

**

p < .01, *** p < .001 (two-tailed)