Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct;27(10):1837–1852. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1374

Table 2.

Validation of MCAO Differential Neuroproteomic Data and Immunoblot Comparison between Injury Models

 
 
 
MCAO
TBI
 
 
 
Gel banda
Δ Peptide count
Blot banda
Blot banda
Protein Accession no. Mr (kDa) 30 min 2 h 30 min 2 h 30 min 2 h 1.6 mm
Amphiphysin O08838 125 91% 68%*** 86%
    110 120% 38% 0 −2 110% 44%** 18%**
GAPDH P04797 36 27% 110% −2 3 93%* 100% 70%*
PYGB P53534 97 54% 20% −10 −14 86% 50%*** 65%*
    67b 110% 170%*** 260%***
NSE P07323 47 280% 530% 2 4 130%* 120%* 67%*
SNAP25 P60881 23 100% 47% −1 −3 150% 50%* 25%*
Spectrin (α2) P16086 280 89% 20% 1 −2 86% 44%* 66%*
    150b 140% 460% 0 2 120% 300%** 370%***
    145b 130% 430%*** 750%***
Synapsin P09951 74 55% 38% −2 −2 94% 44%*** 27%***
UCHL1 Q00981 25 100% 50% 2 −2 93% 71%* 130%
a

Percent of control value.

b

Protein breakdown product.

*

p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001 significantly different from sham-operated animals.

MCAO, middle cerebral artery occlusion; TBI, traumatic brain injury; UCHL1, ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1; SNAP25, synaptosomal-associated protein 25; NSE, neuron-specific enolase; PYGB, glycogen phosphorylase (brain form); GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.