Skip to main content
. 2010 Fall;15(3):e45–e51.

TABLE 4.

Main characteristics of the study patients according to the presence of left atrial (LA) dilation and/or supernormal systolic force

No LA dilation and no supernormal LASF LA dilation ‘alone’ Supernormal LASF ‘alone’ LA dilation and supernormal LASF P
Prevalence of patients, %
  Controls (n=100) 95 2 2 1
  Hypertension (n=181) 80 9 7 4
  Aortic stenosis (n=85) 46 8 27 19
  Hypertrophic CMP (n=40) 53 11 20 15
  Dilated CMP (n=94) 30 13 29 28
  Total (n=500) 67 8 14 11
Age, years 71±9 74±8 74±8 76±10 *
Male sex, % 43 49 45 51
Body mass index, kg/m2 25±4 27±4 26±4 27±4 *
Heart rate, beats/min 68±11 66±10 69±10 68±9
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 144±18 145±20 144±21 143±26
NYHA functional class (I–IV scale) 1.1±0.4 1.5±0.8 1.7±0.7 1.9±0.8 *
Relative wall thickness 0.40±0.07 0.41±0.08 0.41±0.1 0.38±0.1
LV mass, g/m2.7 43±12 59±12 56±13 67±19 *
Midwall fractional shortening, % 16.5±3.0 15.2±3.3 15.3±3.4 13.8±3.3 *
CESS, mmHg/mm 135±41 145±60 130±44 138±38
Peak LV end-systolic pressure, mmHg 146±22 153±29 154±30 155±37 *
LV end-diastolic volume, mL/m3 20.5±4.8 29.4±8.1 26.7±7.9 34.4±12.2 *
LV ejection fraction, % 62±9 55±17 53±14 50±15 *
LV stroke volume, mL/beat 70±17 80±20 79±22 80±20 *
Peak E wave velocity mitral flow, cm/s 58±15 63±14 60±15 66±21
Peak A wave velocity mitral flow, cm/s 69±14 59±14 92±12 93±19
Deceleration time of mitral flow, ms 239±70 243±95 270±90 245±62
Normal diastolic function, % 76 32 21 15 *
Mild diastolic dysfunction, % 24 68 79 85 *

Data presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

*

P<0.05 when comparing normal LA size/LA systolic force (LASF) with LA dilation ‘alone’;

P<0.05 when comparing normal LA size/LASF with LASF ‘alone’;

P<0.05 when comparing normal LA size/LASF with LA dilation and supernormal LASF. CESS Circumferential end-systolic stress; CMP Cardiomyopathy; LV Left ventricular; NYHA New York Heart Association