Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 13;5(10):e13208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013208

Figure 5. FES as a function of Inline graphicInline graphic vs. Inline graphic contacts (top panels) and of Inline graphicInline graphic vs. Inline graphic contacts (bottom panels) at TInline graphic = 0.969, TInline graphic = 0.998 and TInline graphic = 1.021.

Figure 5

FES are obtained by reweighting the structure-based potential PTMetaD simulation. Isoenergy lines are drawn every Inline graphic. In dashed lines, projection of the relevant part of the all-atom explicit-solvent unfolding simulations at 700K (blue and red) and 500K (yellow).