Table 1. Species' predicted annual mortality rates.
Mortality in forest mean environment | Mortality in each species' median environment | |||
Species | Annual mortality rate | 95% CI | Annual mortality rate | 95% CI |
Acer rubrum | 0.0035 | (0.0034, 0.0038) | 0.0022 | (0.0020,0.0023) |
Acer saccharum | 0.0108 | (0.0104, 0.0112) | 0.0052 | (0.0049,0.0054) |
Betula papyrifera | 0.0012 | (0.0010, 0.0014) | 0.0009 | (0.0008,0.0011) |
Carya spp | 0.0011 | (0.0009, 0.0012) | 0.0026 | (0.0023,0.0028) |
Fagus grandifolia | 0.0020 | (0.0018, 0.0022) | 0.0017 | (0.0014,0.0019) |
Fraxinus americana | 0.0016 | (0.0014, 0.0018) | 0.0008 | (0.0007,0.0010) |
Liquidambar styraciflua | 0.0040 | (0.0037, 0.0042) | 0.0048 | (0.0045,0.0052) |
Liriodendron tulipifera | 0.0005 | (0.0004, 0.0006) | 0.0009 | (0.0008,0.0010) |
Nyssa sylvatica | 0.0180 | (0.0170, 0.0187) | 0.0323 | (0.0311,0.0336) |
N. sylvatica (biflora) | 0.0044 | (0.0040, 0.0049) | 0.0098 | (0.0090,0.0104) |
Populus tremuloides | 0.0017 | (0.0015, 0.0018) | 0.0407 | (0.0399,0.0414) |
Quercus alba | 0.0016 | (0.0015, 0.0017) | 0.0013 | (0.0012,0.0014) |
Quercus nigra | 0.0094 | (0.0088, 0.0102) | 0.0068 | (0.0063,0.0074) |
Quercus prinus | 0.0004 | (0.0003, 0.0005) | 0.0005 | (0.0004,0.0006) |
Quercus rubrum | 0.0062 | (0.0059, 0.0064) | 0.0035 | (0.0033,0.0038) |
Quercus stellata | 0.0392 | (0.0384, 0.0399) | 0.0083 | (0.0078,0.0088) |
Quercus velutina | 0.0114 | (0.0110, 0.0119) | 0.0072 | (0.0068,0.0075) |
Pinus echinata | 0.0157 | (0.0151, 0.0163) | 0.0054 | (0.0051,0.0057) |
Pinus taeda | 0.0020 | (0.0018, 0.0022) | 0.0054 | (0.0052,0.0057) |
Pinus virginiana | 0.0047 | (0.0042, 0.0052) | 0.0282 | (0.0271,0.0299) |
Thuja occidentalis | 0.0114 | (0.0110, 0.0119) | 0.0011 | (0.0010,0.0013) |
Predicted baseline annual mortality rate (deaths tree−1 year−1) calculated for each species both in the mean environment of the dataset for 20cm dbh trees, and at each species' median environmental conditions (that is the conditions at which the highest number of individuals within the dataset were found), using the best fit model. 95% confidence interval for the mortality rates are also given.