Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 22;65B(6):715–719. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp115

Table 1.

Participant Characteristics According to Timed Gait at Baseline

Characteristics Slow timed gait (n = 322) Normal timed gait (n = 432) p Value
SRHa
    Excellent/Very Good/Good 184 (57.1) 359 (83.1) <.001
    Fair/Poor 138 (42.9) 73 (16.9)
Demographics
    Age (years) 80.4 ± 5.4 77.0 ± 4.7 <.001
    Female 227 (70.5) 260 (60.2) .003
    White race 283 (87.9) 399 (92.4) .04
    Education (years) 11.6 ± 2.9 12.8 ± 2.8 <.001
    Living alone 150 (46.6) 148 (34.3) <.001
Biomedical
    Number of chronic   conditionsb 2.2 ± 1.3 1.6 ± 1.1 <.001
    MMSE scorec 26.3 ± 2.6 27.1 ± 2.3 <.001
Psychosocial
    Depressive symptomsd 95 (29.5) 61 (14.1) <.001
    Self-efficacye 25.1 ± 7.1 34.0 ± 5.6 <.001
    Social supportf 21.9 ± 5.7 22.7 ± 5.3 .05
    Social activityg 7.2 ± 3.2 9.5 ± 2.9 <.001
ADLs
    ADL scoreh 20.6 ± 3.3 23.1 ± 1.7 <.001

Notes: p Values were determined using SAS statistical software, version 9.1. Data are given as M ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Data are given as n (%) of participants. SRH = self-rated health; ADLs = activities of daily living; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination.

a

Mean timed gait at baseline for those with Fair/Poor SRH was 13.03 ± 7.14 s compared with 9.81 ± 5.73 among those with Excellent/Very Good/Good SRH (p < .001).

b

Number of chronic conditions was ascertained based on the presence of nine self-reported, physician-diagnosed chronic conditions, including hypertension, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, stroke, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, hip fracture, chronic lung disease, and cancer (other than minor skin cancer).

c

Cognitive status was assessed by the Folstein MMSE, with lower scores indicating worse cognitive status (range 0–30).

d

Depressive symptoms were determined by the 11-item version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale, with a score of 16 and more indicating clinically significant depression.

e

Self-efficacy was determined by a modified version of the Falls Efficacy Scale, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy (range 0–40).

f

Social support was determined by the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy (range 0–28).

g

Social activity levels were determined by the Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies in the Elderly Social Activity Instrument, with higher scores indicating higher social support (range 0–20).

h

Participants were asked if they needed help from another person to perform the following 12 ADLs: bathing, dressing, transferring, walking around house or apartment, eating, grooming, toileting, shopping, housework, meal preparation, taking medications, and paying bills. Responses were scored as 0 (needs help/unable to do), 1 (no help needed but difficulty), or 2 (no help needed, no difficulty), with an overall ADL scale ranging from 0 to 24.