Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 6;65B(6):691–697. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbq054

Table 2.

Mean Outcome Scores, ESML Group Participants Versus WL Controls

Mean (SD) score
Outcome measure Baseline Posttreatment
Quality of Life—AD
    ESML 39.01 (5.99) 39.61 (5.29)
    WL 38.82 (5.55) 37.75 (6.28)
SF-36: Physical Components Summary
    ESML 41.98 (11.77) 41.42 (11.11)
    WL 43.92 (11.04) 42.02 (11.09)
SF-36: Mental Health Components Summary
    ESML 51.52 (11.56) 52.25 (10.97)
    WL 48.80 (10.58) 49.29 (11.11)
SF-36: Social Functioning Subscalea
    ESML 77.63 (24.93) 80.19 (24.31)
    WL 78.53 (21.03) 71.93 (25.46)
Geriatric Depression Scale
    ESML 5.34 (3.50) 5.05 (3.47)
    WL 5.27 (3.37) 5.91 (4.03)
Communication—FAM
    ESML 1.88 (.32) 1.78 (.35)
    WL 1.92 (.38) 1.91 (.41)
Perceived Stress Scale
    ESML 19.30 (7.11) 18.23 (7.06)
    WL 20.39 (6.61) 20.75 (8.10)
Self-efficacy
    ESML 7.92 (1.32) 8.03 (1.29)
    WL 7.85 (1.53) 7.63 (1.47)
RMBPC memory: Caregiver reaction
    ESML 1.24 (.74) 1.07 (.70)
    WL 1.08 (.74) 1.04 (.70)

Notes: Sample sizes: ESML, baseline = 96, posttest = 92 and WL, baseline = 46, posttest = 44. AD = Alzheimer’s disease; ESML = early-stage memory loss; FAM = family assessment measure; RMBPC = Revised Memory And Behavior Problem Checklist; SF-36 = 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey; WL = wait list

a

Social functioning was the only subscale that was significantly different on the SF-36; other subscales not listed.