Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 4;399(2-2):207–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.04.011

Table 1.

ecCTLA4
Data collection
Space group P3121
Cell dimensions
 a, b, c (Å) 43.0, 43.0, 140.1
 α, β, γ (°) 90, 90, 120
Resolution (Å) 18.6–2.6
Rmerge 3.6 (20.0)
II 29.1 (9.0)
No. of reflections/no. unique 99,136/4488
Completeness (%) 85.0 (45.8)
Redundancy 22.1 (21.3)



Refinement
Resolution (Å) 18.6–2.6
No. of reflections 4289
Rwork/Rfree 19.2/24.5⁎
No. of atoms
 Protein 914
 Water 50
B-factors
 Protein (main chain) 26.6
 Protein (side chain) 31.1
 Water 22.1
 Overall 28.4
R.M.S.D.s
 Bond lengths (Å) 0.006
 Bond angles (°) 1.03
Ramachandran plot analysis
 Outliers 0.00%
 In allowed regions 4.31%
 In preferred regions 95.69%

The CTLA4 vl-Ig was concentrated to 10 mg/ml in Hepes-buffered saline at pH 7.4 and crystallised in 0.02 M magnesium chloride, 0.1 M Hepes (pH 7.5), 22% (w/v) polyacrylic acid 5100 sodium salt and 0.4 M NDSB-256 (nondetergent sulfobetaine 256, dimethylbenzylammonium propane sulfonate), or with 6% 1,6-diaminohexane. Crystals appeared after 12 h and were frozen in a stream of nitrogen either with perfluorated oil or with 25% glycerol in the mother liquor as cryoprotectant. Data were collected on a MAR345 in-house detector at a wavelength of 1.542 Å. Data were indexed, integrated and scaled with the XDS package21 and the structure was solved by molecular replacement using PHASER22 with monomeric CTLA4 (Protein Data Bank code 1I8L, the structure of CTLA4 from the complex with B7-13). The structure was refined with Refmac5.423 using a maximum likelihood target alternated with manual rebuilding of the structure (⁎4.2% of the reflections have been used for Rfree calculation, i.e., 189 reflections). Parenthetical values are for the highest-resolution shell.